Energy Levels Retrospective
Map work to high, medium, and low energy zones to redesign how time is spent.
High energy
Work that excites and sustains you—do more where possible.
Medium energy
Necessary but neutral tasks—optimize or batch.
Low energy
Draining work—delegate, automate, reduce, or pair for support.
This board is for demo purposes only. Your responses are not saved. Close or refresh the page to clear all cards. Do not add any sensitive information.
What is the Energy Levels Retrospective?
The Energy Levels Retrospective is a format designed to help teams understand the relationship between their work and their energy. Rooted in positive psychology and burnout prevention research, the format asks team members to categorize their sprint activities into three energy zones: high, medium, and low. The result is a shared map of what energizes the team, what drains them, and what falls neutrally in between.
The three columns represent an energy spectrum. "High Energy" captures work that excites, motivates, and sustains people—the tasks they look forward to and lose themselves in. "Medium Energy" holds necessary but neutral work—tasks that do not generate enthusiasm but also do not drain. "Low Energy" identifies work that depletes, frustrates, or bores—the activities that people dread and that contribute to burnout over time.
This format addresses a dimension of team health that most retrospective formats ignore: the sustainability of the team's work patterns. A team can be highly productive in the short term while doing work that drains everyone's energy. Without a format that explicitly examines energy, this unsustainable pattern continues until people burn out, disengage, or leave. The Energy Levels Retrospective makes this invisible dynamic visible and actionable.
When to use the Energy Levels Retrospective
This format is most valuable during or after periods of sustained effort—long projects, multiple consecutive sprints without a break, or times when the team is carrying a heavy operational burden alongside development work. It is also excellent when you notice early signs of burnout: declining enthusiasm, increased sick days, reduced participation in team activities, or a general sense of going through the motions.
Teams of three to ten people benefit most, and sessions run 45 to 60 minutes. The format is particularly valuable for teams where work allocation is flexible—if the team has some control over how tasks are distributed, the insights from this retro can directly inform a more energizing work distribution. It is also useful for managers and tech leads who want to understand what types of work their team finds energizing versus draining.
Use this format quarterly or whenever you sense the team's energy declining. Avoid using it as a complaint session about unfavorable work—the goal is not to eliminate all low-energy work (some of it is necessary) but to ensure the overall mix is sustainable. Also avoid it when the team has no agency over their work allocation, as surfacing energy imbalances without the power to change them creates frustration rather than improvement.
How to facilitate the Energy Levels Retrospective
Begin with a personal energy check-in: "On a scale of one to ten, what is your energy level right now?" This grounds the conversation and gives the facilitator an immediate read on the room. Then ask the team to think about the past sprint and write cards for each energy zone. Encourage specificity: not "coding" but "implementing the new payment integration" or "fixing legacy CSS bugs." The same general category can produce high and low energy depending on context.
Process High Energy first to identify what the team finds most engaging. Ask follow-up questions: "What about this work gives you energy? Is it the challenge, the learning, the impact, the autonomy, or something else?" Understanding why something is energizing helps the team create more of those conditions. Then process Low Energy with empathy: "What about this drains you? Is it the repetition, the frustration, the lack of impact, or the working conditions?"
After processing all columns, facilitate a design conversation: "Given what we have learned about our energy, how might we redesign our next sprint to increase the high-energy work and reduce or restructure the low-energy work?" Brainstorm concrete strategies: task rotation, automation of drudgery, pairing on draining tasks, batching low-energy work into focused blocks, or trading tasks between team members who have different energy profiles.
Tips for getting the most out of the Energy Levels Retrospective
The most important insight this format produces is the discovery that energy profiles differ between team members. What drains one person may energize another. Bug triage might be tedious for a senior developer but exciting for a junior who is learning the codebase. Documentation might drain one person but satisfy another who values clarity. These differences are an untapped resource for work allocation optimization.
Do not frame low-energy work as "bad work" that should be eliminated. Some low-energy work is essential and cannot be avoided—infrastructure maintenance, compliance tasks, or production support. The goal is not zero low-energy work but rather a sustainable ratio. A general guideline is that no more than 30 percent of any person's sprint should be low-energy work. If the ratio is worse, either redistribute, automate, or create recovery time.
Track energy distributions over multiple sprints. If the same work consistently appears in the low-energy column across multiple team members and multiple sprints, it is a strong candidate for automation, outsourcing, or fundamental restructuring. Persistent low-energy work that cannot be changed warrants a conversation about whether it should be owned by this team at all.
Variations and adaptations
For remote teams, create a visual energy map where team members plot their sprint activities on a timeline with an energy line showing highs and lows throughout the two weeks. Comparing these personal energy maps reveals patterns: does energy dip every Monday after planning? Does it spike after deployment? These temporal patterns inform not just what work to change but when to schedule different types of work for maximum team energy.
For async teams, run a daily energy micro-survey: "Rate your energy today on a three-point scale (high, medium, low) and note what you worked on." After two weeks, compile the data into an energy-work correlation map. The synchronous retro session analyzes the compiled data, looking for patterns that individual daily entries cannot reveal. This longitudinal approach produces richer insights than a single retrospective session.
A powerful variation adds a fourth category: "Energy Generators"—activities that actively replenish energy beyond the work itself, such as learning sessions, team social events, hackathon time, or mentoring. By explicitly identifying energy generators, the team can protect and expand these activities as strategic investments in sustainability. Another adaptation for teams experiencing burnout adds a "Recovery" planning column where the team designs specific recovery actions: blocked calendar time, reduced sprint scope, or rotating on-call responsibilities to distribute the drain more equitably.
Run Retrospectives in CodeKudu
CodeKudu includes dozens of retrospective board templates, anonymous feedback, AI summaries, and action items that sync to GitHub Issues, Jira, and Linear.
